Current:Home > MySocial Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says -MarketPoint
Social Security checks face $17,400 cut if program isn't shored up, study says
View
Date:2025-04-24 11:50:01
Social Security is on track to cut benefits to retirees in 2033, when its trust fund reserves are forecast to be depleted. The reduction could be substantial, according to a new analysis.
Unless the program is shored up before 2033, the typical newly retired, dual-earner couple will see their Social Security checks reduced by $17,400 annually, or $1,450 per month, according to the report from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
A newly retired couple with one earner would see a cut of $13,100, the report said. The analysis, which is based on current dollars, doesn't forecast the impact on newly retired single earners, but the Social Security Administration has estimated that benefits will be cut by 23% in 2033 unless the program is strengthened.
Those cuts could prove devastating to roughly 50 million older Americans who receive Social Security checks, with the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget forecasting that "senior poverty would rise significantly upon insolvency." Still, there are plenty of proposals to fix Social Security's looming funding shortfall, either by raising taxes or increasing the retirement age, or a combination of the two.
The current average monthly benefit check for single earners is about $1,800, according to the Social Security Administration.
"Smash the cap"
Some Democratic lawmakers and left-leaning policy experts say there's a simple fix: "Smash the cap," which refers to the Social Security tax cap.
That cap, a feature of the program since its start in the 1930s following the Great Depression, means that any income over that level isn't subject to the Social Security payroll tax, which is 6.2% for workers and an additional 6.2% for employers. In 2023, the tax cap stands at $160,200, which means any income above that amount is exempt from the payroll tax.
But critics say this places the burden of funding Social Security on low- and middle-income earners, while higher-income Americans get a break. For instance, a middle-income worker earning less than the $160,200 cap in 2023 will pay an effective tax rate that is six times higher than that of a millionaire.
Eliminating the cap would subject higher earnings to payroll tax, generating additional revenue for Social Security and helping to stabilize its finances, proponents say.
Raise the retirement age
Some Republican lawmakers and right-leaning experts are opposed to higher taxes, however, and instead have proposed raising the retirement age.
Last year, some Republican lawmakers floated the idea of lifting the retirement age to 70 — from its current age of 66 to 67, depending on one's birth year — citing the "miracle" of longer life expectancies.
Yet critics point out that many people can't work until they are 70, due to health issues or other reasons. And even if an older worker could remain in the labor force until they were 70, it still would amount to a benefits cut because they would be losing between three to four years of Social Security checks as a result.
- In:
- Social Security
veryGood! (47)
Related
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- WNBA posts A grades in racial and gender hiring in diversity report card
- What is Alaskapox? Recent death brings attention to virus seen in small animals
- John Oliver on 'Last Week Tonight' return, Trump 2024 and the episode that hasn't aged well
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Jury deliberations start in murder trial of former sheriff’s deputy who fatally shot man
- Casino and lottery proposal swiftly advances in the Alabama Legislature
- 'It almost felt like you could trust him.' How feds say a Texas con man stole millions
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Jason Kelce tells Travis he 'crossed the line' on the Andy Reid bump during Super Bowl
Ranking
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- 3 police officers shot at active scene in D.C. when barricaded suspect opened fire
- How Gigi Hadid and Bradley Cooper Spent Their First Valentine's Day Together
- Missouri Supreme Court sets June execution date for convicted killer David Hosier
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Kate Hudson says she receives 10-cent residual payments for 'Home Alone 2: Lost in New York'
- Super Bowl winner Travis Kelce has a new side hustle — the movies
- Democratic voters in Philadelphia's competitive Bucks County say they're unconcerned about Biden's age
Recommendation
Why Sean "Diddy" Combs Is Being Given a Laptop in Jail Amid Witness Intimidation Fears
Oscars, take note: 'Poor Things' built its weird, unforgettable world from scratch
Australia's 'Swiftposium' attracts global intellectuals to discuss Taylor Swift
The Daily Money: Expect a smaller Social Security bump in 2025
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
What is Alaskapox? Recent death brings attention to virus seen in small animals
Yemen's Houthi rebels target carrier ship bound for Iran, their main supporter
Missouri high court says Planned Parenthood can receive funding; cites failed appeal by state